| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
An argument map or argument diagram is a v … An argument map or argument diagram is a visual representation of the structure of an argument. An argument map typically includes the key components of the argument, traditionally called the conclusion and the premises, also called contention and reasons. Argument maps can also show co-premises, objections, counterarguments, rebuttals, and lemmas. There are different styles of argument map but they are often functionally equivalent and represent an argument's individual claims and the relationships between them. Argument maps are commonly used in the context of teaching and applying critical thinking. The purpose of mapping is to uncover the logical structure of arguments, identify unstated assumptions, evaluate the support an argument offers for a conclusion, and aid understanding of debates. Argument maps are often designed to support deliberation of issues, ideas and arguments in wicked problems. An argument map is not to be confused with a concept map or a mind map, two other kinds of node–link diagram which have different constraints on nodes and links. different constraints on nodes and links.
, Um mapa de argumentos é a representação vi … Um mapa de argumentos é a representação visual da estrutura de um argumento em lógica informal. Ele inclui os componentes de um argumento, tais como a contenção principal, premissas, , objeções, contra-argumentos e lemas. Mapas de argumentos são utilizados freqüentemente no ensino de raciocínio e pensamento crítico, e podem suportar a análise de prós e contras quando deliberando sobre . prós e contras quando deliberando sobre .
, Карта аргументов (англ. Argument map) — ме … Карта аргументов (англ. Argument map) — метод структуризации и визуальное представление структуры дискуссии, с использованием графической записи в виде диаграммы. Карта аргументов обычно включает ключевые компоненты аргумента, традиционно называемые заключением, и предпосылки, также называемые разногласиями и причинами. Карты аргументов также могут отображать общие предпосылки, возражения, контраргументы, опровержения и леммы. Существуют разные стили карты аргументов, но они часто функционально эквивалентны и представляют отдельные утверждения аргумента и отношения между ними. Карты аргументов обычно используются в контексте обучения и применения критического мышления. Целью картирования является выявление логической структуры аргументов, выявление невысказанных предположений, оценка поддержки, которую предлагает аргумент для вывода, и помощь в понимании дебатов. Карты аргументов часто предназначены для поддержки обсуждения вопросов, идей и аргументов в сложных проблемах. Карту аргументов не следует путать с концептуальной картой или диаграммой связей, двумя другими видами диаграмм узлов и связей, которые имеют разные ограничения на узлы и связи. имеют разные ограничения на узлы и связи.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Argument_Map.png?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=dNijwv-my_kC +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20131229012710/http:/www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/harrell/HarrellTeachingPhilosophy2008.pdf +
, https://www.academia.edu/2992281 +
, https://philarchive.org/rec/HARUAD-9 +
, http://cogprints.org/3008/1/reasonpaper.pdf +
, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232947753 +
, https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=loa4BAAAQBAJ +
, http://www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.html +
, https://archive.org/details/visuallanguagegl0000horn +
, http://www.georgbrun.ch/publications/Brun-Betz-AnalysingPracticalArgumentation.pdf +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20110504035147/http:/www.dougengelbart.org/pubs/augment-3906.html +
, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225708550 +
, https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=Gb2uuT1zrAAC&pg=PA153 +
, https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=Q2a_RtDZUGgC +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20080928062226/http:/www.newscientist.com/article/mg16321944.700-beyond-words.html +
, https://archive.org/details/usesofargument0000toul_v7v3 +
, https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=T53YBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA483 +
, http://works.bepress.com/michael_hoffmann/39/ +
, http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/harrell/ArgumentDiagramsInClassroom.pdf +
, http://cset.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/documents/publications/Simon-Learning%20to%20Teach%20Argumentation.pdf +
, http://www.elon.edu/u/academics/arts-and-sciences/philosophy/wp-content/uploads/sites/258/2017/10/AJC-step-by-step-article_.pdf +
, https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16321944.700-beyond-words.html +
, https://archive.org/details/reasoning0000scri +
, http://semantic-web-journal.org/sites/default/files/swj138_0.pdf +
, https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_5mgAAAAAMAAJ +
, http://timvangelder.com/2009/02/17/what-is-argument-mapping/ +
, https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=ScvV9riTOGsC +
, http://www.philmaps.com/ +
, https://www.academia.edu/772321 +
, http://windsor.scholarsportal.info/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2278 +
, http://images.austhink.com/pdf/Claudia-Alvarez-thesis.pdf +
, https://archive.org/details/thinkingstraight0000bear +
, https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/Web/People/bmclaren/pubs/ScheuerEtAl-CompSupportedArgStateOfTheArt-IJCSCL2010.pdf +
, https://archive.org/details/principlesjudic00wigmgoog +
, https://philpapers.org/rec/DAVCAM-8 +
, http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/5048/ +
, http://cmc.ihmc.us/cmc2008papers/cmc2008-p021.pdf +
, http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/harrell/HarrellTeachingPhilosophy2008.pdf +
, https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofar0000eeme +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20060907141143/http:/www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/harrell/ArgumentDiagramsInClassroom.pdf +
, http://sites.google.com/site/timvangelder/publications-1/therationaleforrationale/TheRationaleforRationale.pdf +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20150919030637/https:/cset.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/documents/publications/Simon-Learning%20to%20Teach%20Argumentation.pdf +
, https://web.archive.org/web/20120708000509/http:/images.austhink.com/pdf/Claudia-Alvarez-thesis.pdf +
, http://www.martinhilbert.net/e-democracyHilbertJITP.pdf +
, http://www.arg.dundee.ac.uk/people/chris/publications/2013/AIF-ASPIC-JLC-Final.pdf +
, http://lpr.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1-4/59.full.pdf +
, https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=vaU0AAAAQBAJ +
, http://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10379/2617/C.Dwyer-PhD%20Thesis%20Psychology.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
6190251
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
52036
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1111627382
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tim_van_Gelder +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/John_Henry_Wigmore +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Journal_of_Logic_and_Computation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Counterargument +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lightweight_markup_language +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Semantic_tableau +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Melbourne +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/GIBIS +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cognitive_load +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Co-premise +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Software_application +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Birmingham +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stephen_Toulmin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Compendium_%28software%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Routledge +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cambridge_University_Press +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tree_structure +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argument +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Monroe_Beardsley +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/NoteCards +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Communications_of_the_ACM +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Palgrave_Macmillan +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hypertext +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mind_map +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Prentice-Hall +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Intelligence_augmentation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Human%E2%80%93computer_interaction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Concept_map +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Henry_Sidgwick +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michael_Scriven +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Douglas_Engelbart +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Toulmindiag.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Toulmingeneral.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Intermediate_conclusion.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Premise +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Writing_process +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Scrivendiag.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Wigmore_chart.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/V:en:Wikidebate +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Using_Harrell%27s_procedure.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Whatley.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:A_box_and_line_diagram.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:A_sample_argument_using_objections.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argument_technology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Collaboratorium +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Diagram_using_Beardsley%27s_procedure.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Independent_premises.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lemma_%28logic%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Argument_Map.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Dependent_premises.jpg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Araucaria_%28software%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Warrant_%28rhetoric%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Resource_Description_Framework +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Issue-based_information_system +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Practical_arguments +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Graph_%28discrete_mathematics%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Knowledge_representation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Artificial_intelligence +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tallinn_University +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Philosophical_analogies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reason_%28argument%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Markdown +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Human-readable +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Flow_%28policy_debate%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Objection_%28argument%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dialogue_mapping +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Teaching_Philosophy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Graphic_organizer +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Coherentism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Toulmin_method +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Horst_Rittel +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Informal_logic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rubric_%28academic%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Web_Ontology_Language +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argumentation_framework +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Standard_deviation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Logic_and_dialectic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rebuttal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Logic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lawrence_Erlbaum_Associates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Formal_system +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Informal_fallacy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Richard_Whately +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Decision_tree +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Diagrams +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Problem_structuring_methods +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Debategraph +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Douglas_N._Walton +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Problem_structuring_methods +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Collaborative_decision-making_software +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/E-democracy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Learning_progression +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bayesian_network +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Natural_deduction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Design_rationale +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reflective_equilibrium +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Arguments +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Robert_E._Horn +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rhetorical_structure_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argumentation_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Journal_of_Information_Technology_and_Politics +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Springer-Verlag +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stanford_Research_Institute +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Forensic_science +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Logical_consequence +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Academia.edu +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Critical_thinking +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Logic_of_argumentation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wicked_problem +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Logic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Argument_mapping +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/International_Journal_of_Learning_and_Media +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argumentation_scheme +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/ACM_Transactions_on_Information_Systems +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_news +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Main +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_thesis +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Mindmaps +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Commons_category +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Div_col +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Div_col_end +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Refend +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Refbegin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Quote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:InfoMaps +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_book +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_web +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_journal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Snd +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Logic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Knowledge_representation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Philosophical_analogies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Argument_mapping +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Arguments +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Problem_structuring_methods +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Diagrams +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Representation +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map?oldid=1111627382&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Whatley.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Argument_Map.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/A_sample_argument_using_objections.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/A_box_and_line_diagram.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Scrivendiag.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Intermediate_conclusion.jpg +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Using_Harrell%27s_procedure.jpg +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Diagram_using_Beardsley%27s_procedure.jpg +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Wigmore_chart.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Toulmindiag.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Toulmingeneral.png +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Dependent_premises.jpg +
, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Independent_premises.jpg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage
|
http://philmaps.com +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/cPzp +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Argument_map +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Argument_map +
, http://fa.dbpedia.org/resource/%D9%86%D9%82%D8%B4%D9%87_%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86 +
, http://ru.dbpedia.org/resource/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2 +
, http://kk.dbpedia.org/resource/%D0%90%D1%80%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%8B +
, http://pt.dbpedia.org/resource/Mapa_de_argumentos +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0fvz53 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1645946 +
, http://hu.dbpedia.org/resource/%C3%89rvel%C3%A9si_t%C3%A9rk%C3%A9p +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Um mapa de argumentos é a representação vi … Um mapa de argumentos é a representação visual da estrutura de um argumento em lógica informal. Ele inclui os componentes de um argumento, tais como a contenção principal, premissas, , objeções, contra-argumentos e lemas. Mapas de argumentos são utilizados freqüentemente no ensino de raciocínio e pensamento crítico, e podem suportar a análise de prós e contras quando deliberando sobre . prós e contras quando deliberando sobre .
, Карта аргументов (англ. Argument map) — ме … Карта аргументов (англ. Argument map) — метод структуризации и визуальное представление структуры дискуссии, с использованием графической записи в виде диаграммы. Карта аргументов обычно включает ключевые компоненты аргумента, традиционно называемые заключением, и предпосылки, также называемые разногласиями и причинами. Карты аргументов также могут отображать общие предпосылки, возражения, контраргументы, опровержения и леммы. Существуют разные стили карты аргументов, но они часто функционально эквивалентны и представляют отдельные утверждения аргумента и отношения между ними.ерждения аргумента и отношения между ними.
, An argument map or argument diagram is a v … An argument map or argument diagram is a visual representation of the structure of an argument. An argument map typically includes the key components of the argument, traditionally called the conclusion and the premises, also called contention and reasons. Argument maps can also show co-premises, objections, counterarguments, rebuttals, and lemmas. There are different styles of argument map but they are often functionally equivalent and represent an argument's individual claims and the relationships between them.claims and the relationships between them.
|
| rdfs:label |
Argument map
, Карта аргументов
, Mapa de argumentos
|
