http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
McKinney v University of Guelph [1990] 3 S … McKinney v University of Guelph [1990] 3 SCR 229 is the Supreme Court of Canada case that decided that, for the purpose of determining the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, universities were not part of government. Therefore, the mandatory retirement age for university teachers did not violate equality rights under section 15 of the Charter. In reaching this holding, the Court refined the scope of the Charter as it applies to government bodies as well as the definition of "law" within the ambit of the Charter. of "law" within the ambit of the Charter.
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://www.hrcr.org/safrica/labor/mckinney_guelph.html +
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
1571038
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
6016
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
881911059
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ontario_Human_Rights_Code +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_Fifteen_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Ageism_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:University_of_Guelph +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Section_Fifteen_Charter_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Appeal_for_Ontario +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Labour_relations_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_Thirty-two_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_One_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Retail%2C_Wholesale_and_Department_Store_Union%2C_Local_580_v_Dolphin_Delivery_Ltd +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Guelph +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1990_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Attorney_General_of_Ontario +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases_%28Lamer_Court%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/caseName
|
McKinney v University of Guelph
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
[1990] 3 SCR 229
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence
|
Sopinka J
, Cory J
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedDate
|
"1990-12-06"^^xsd:date
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
L'Heureux-Dubé J
, Wilson J
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/fullCaseName
|
Syed Ziauddin v Board of Governors of Laurentian University and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, Norman Zacour v Governing Council of the University of Toronto and the Attorney General for Ontario
, Ritvars Bregzis v Governing Council of the University of Toronto and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, John A Buttrick v Board of Governors of York University and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, Tillo E Kuhn v Board of Governors of York University and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, Hollis Rinehart, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the York University Faculty Association v Board of Governors of York University and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, Bernard Blishen v Board of Governors of York University and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, David Walter McKinney, Jr v Board of Governors of the University of Guelph and the Attorney General for Ontario;
, Horacio Roque-Nunez v Board of Governors of Laurentian University and the Attorney General for Ontario;
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/heardDate
|
--05-16
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/history
|
Judgment for the universities and the Attorney General of Ontario in the Court of Appeal for Ontario.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Dickson CJ and Gonthier JJ
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
La Forest J
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/notparticipating
|
Lamer and McLachlin JJ
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/ruling
|
Appeal dismissed
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/scc
|
1989
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:SCCInfoBox +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Lexum-scc2 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Notability +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:University_of_Guelph +
|
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Ageism_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Labour_relations_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Section_Fifteen_Charter_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1990_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:University_of_Guelph +
|
http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court +
|
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKinney_v_University_of_Guelph?oldid=881911059&ns=0 +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McKinney_v_University_of_Guelph +
|
owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6801983 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4rafz +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/McKinney_v_University_of_Guelph +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05c9v4 +
|
rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Place +
|
rdfs:comment |
McKinney v University of Guelph [1990] 3 S … McKinney v University of Guelph [1990] 3 SCR 229 is the Supreme Court of Canada case that decided that, for the purpose of determining the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, universities were not part of government. Therefore, the mandatory retirement age for university teachers did not violate equality rights under section 15 of the Charter. In reaching this holding, the Court refined the scope of the Charter as it applies to government bodies as well as the definition of "law" within the ambit of the Charter. of "law" within the ambit of the Charter.
|
rdfs:label |
McKinney v University of Guelph
|