http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Egan c. Canada (ou "James Egan contre l'État canadien") est une décision de la Cour suprême du Canada à propos des droits des homosexuels.
, 艾根诉加拿大案(Egan v. Canada)[1995] 2 S.C.R.513是 … 艾根诉加拿大案(Egan v. Canada)[1995] 2 S.C.R.513是加拿大最高法院围绕同性恋权利而作出的一个判决。 (James Egan)和(John Norris Nesbit)是一对自1948年开始维系着“婚姻关系”的同性恋爱人。1986年,65岁的艾根根据加拿大《》(Old Age Security Act)领取(Old Age Security)。奈斯比特满60岁的时候,他根据同一法律文件申请配偶津贴。但他的申请被拒绝,因为行政机关认为艾根和奈斯比特之间的关系不是《》里所保障的配偶关系。艾根随之起诉。在地方法院和联邦上诉法院输掉了官司以后,艾根和奈斯比特上诉至加拿大最高法院。 1995年3月25日,最高法院驳回了上诉,判定《》中的“异性结合是能构成配偶关系的条件之一”的规定是符合加拿大宪法的。 但同时,由于全体法官一直认为,基于性取向的歧视是为《加拿大权利与自由宪章》第十五部分所禁止的。这使得这个判决成为一个具有争议性的,要求给予同性恋权利保障的判决书。按照《加拿大权利与自由宪章》的规定: 判决认为: 这个判决成为一个先例:《加拿大权利与自由宪章》第十五部分禁止基于性倾向的歧视。而性取向也被认为是“隐藏”在权利与自由宪章里的一个条目。五部分禁止基于性倾向的歧视。而性取向也被认为是“隐藏”在权利与自由宪章里的一个条目。
, Egan v Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513 was one of … Egan v Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513 was one of a trilogy of equality rights cases published by a very divided Supreme Court of Canada in the spring of 1995. It stands today as a landmark Supreme Court case which established that sexual orientation constitutes a prohibited basis of discrimination under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.e Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://archive.today/20040702172117/http:/reports.fja.gc.ca/fc/src/shtml/1993/pub/v3/1993fca0355.shtml +
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
571061
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
23716
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1104911977
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_LGBT_rights_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Federal_Court_of_Appeal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_Fifteen_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/McKinney_v_University_of_Guelph +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Section_Fifteen_Charter_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Little_Sisters_Book_and_Art_Emporium_v._Canada_%28Minister_of_Justice%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1995_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_One_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Joseph_Arvay +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/M_v_H +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1995_in_LGBT_history +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Federal_Court_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ratio_decidendi +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/LGBTQ_rights +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jim_Egan_%28activist%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/M._v._H. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/1995_in_gay_rights +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Law_v._Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Miron_v._Trudel +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trinity_Western_University_v._British_Columbia_College_of_Teachers +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Halpern_v._Canada_%28Attorney_General%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Old_Age_Security +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Labour_relations_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vriend_v._Alberta +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chamberlain_v._Surrey_School_District_No._36 +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/caseName
|
Egan v Canada
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
[1995] 2 SCR 513, 124 DLR 609, 12 RFL 201, 29 CRR 79, 96 FTR 80
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence
|
Sopinka J
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedDate
|
--05-25
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Cory and Iacobucci JJ
, L'Heureux-Dubé J
, McLachlin J
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/docket
|
23636
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/fullCaseName
|
James Egan and John Norris Nesbit v. Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Canada
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/heardDate
|
--11-01
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/history
|
Appeal dismissed by the Federal Court of Appeal.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Lamer CJ and Gonthier and Major JJ
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/lawsapplied
|
15.0
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
La Forest J
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/ratio
|
The definition of "spouse" in section 2 of the Old Age Security Act, which excludes same-sex couples, is constitutional. Sexual orientation is a prohibited ground of discrimination under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/ruling
|
Appeal dismissed
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/scc
|
1992
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Lexum-scc2 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:LGBT_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:SCCInfoBox +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1995_in_LGBT_history +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_LGBT_rights_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Section_Fifteen_Charter_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Labour_relations_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1995_in_Canadian_case_law +
|
http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trilogy +
|
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egan_v_Canada?oldid=1104911977&ns=0 +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egan_v_Canada +
|
owl:sameAs |
http://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/Egan_c._Canada +
, http://zh.dbpedia.org/resource/%E8%89%BE%E6%A0%B9%E8%AF%89%E5%8A%A0%E6%8B%BF%E5%A4%A7%E6%A1%88 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.02r5v4 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/2q3u2 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q3049112 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Egan_v_Canada +
|
rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Work +
|
rdfs:comment |
Egan c. Canada (ou "James Egan contre l'État canadien") est une décision de la Cour suprême du Canada à propos des droits des homosexuels.
, 艾根诉加拿大案(Egan v. Canada)[1995] 2 S.C.R.513是 … 艾根诉加拿大案(Egan v. Canada)[1995] 2 S.C.R.513是加拿大最高法院围绕同性恋权利而作出的一个判决。 (James Egan)和(John Norris Nesbit)是一对自1948年开始维系着“婚姻关系”的同性恋爱人。1986年,65岁的艾根根据加拿大《》(Old Age Security Act)领取(Old Age Security)。奈斯比特满60岁的时候,他根据同一法律文件申请配偶津贴。但他的申请被拒绝,因为行政机关认为艾根和奈斯比特之间的关系不是《》里所保障的配偶关系。艾根随之起诉。在地方法院和联邦上诉法院输掉了官司以后,艾根和奈斯比特上诉至加拿大最高法院。 1995年3月25日,最高法院驳回了上诉,判定《》中的“异性结合是能构成配偶关系的条件之一”的规定是符合加拿大宪法的。 但同时,由于全体法官一直认为,基于性取向的歧视是为《加拿大权利与自由宪章》第十五部分所禁止的。这使得这个判决成为一个具有争议性的,要求给予同性恋权利保障的判决书。按照《加拿大权利与自由宪章》的规定: 判决认为: 这个判决成为一个先例:《加拿大权利与自由宪章》第十五部分禁止基于性倾向的歧视。而性取向也被认为是“隐藏”在权利与自由宪章里的一个条目。五部分禁止基于性倾向的歧视。而性取向也被认为是“隐藏”在权利与自由宪章里的一个条目。
, Egan v Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513 was one of … Egan v Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513 was one of a trilogy of equality rights cases published by a very divided Supreme Court of Canada in the spring of 1995. It stands today as a landmark Supreme Court case which established that sexual orientation constitutes a prohibited basis of discrimination under section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.e Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
|
rdfs:label |
Egan c. Canada
, 艾根诉加拿大案
, Egan v Canada
|