| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
미국 대 시거 사건(United States v. Seeger, 380 U. … 미국 대 시거 사건(United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965))은 미국 연방대법원 판례로 양심적 병역거부자에 대한 유명 판결이다. 양심적 병역거부는 종교적 신념에서만 가능한 것이 아니라 "신에 대한 정통적 믿음으로 꽉 차 있는 신념에 비견되는 정도로 그 신념의 소유자의 삶에서 자리잡고 있는" "진지하고 유의미한"(sincere and meaningful) 신념에서도 가능하다고 판시하였다. 청원인인 Seeger는 병역거부로 기소되었는데 그는 신의 존재를 믿지 않으나 자신의 신념으로 집총을 거부하였다. 이는 양심적 병역거부를 심사하는 기준에 부합하지 않았고 그는 병역기피로 기소되자 그는 대법원에 상소하였다. 미국 대법원에 따르면 법원은 종교의 자유의 원칙에 따라 청원인이 절대 유일신에 대한 믿음이 없다는 이유로 종교적이지 않다고 판단하는 것은 위헌이라고 판시하였다.믿음이 없다는 이유로 종교적이지 않다고 판단하는 것은 위헌이라고 판시하였다.
, United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (196 … United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the exemption from the military draft for conscientious objectors could be reserved not only for those professing conformity with the moral directives of a supreme being but also for those whose views on war derived from a "sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those" who had routinely gotten the exemption. The case resolved, on diverse but related grounds, three cases, each involving conviction for failure to accept induction into the armed forces on the part of someone who sought conscientious-objector status without "belong[ing] to an orthodox religious sect". The accused, whose cases were otherwise unrelated, were Arno Sascha Jakobson, Forest Britt Peter, and Daniel Andrew Seeger; it was Seeger's case that gave its name to the multi-case decision. gave its name to the multi-case decision.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/163/ +
, https://archive.org/details/constitutionreli0000unse/page/454 +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/216/516/2339320/ +
, http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep380/usrep380163/usrep380163.pdf +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/326/846/279501/ +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/324/173/201583/ +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/325/409/403443/ +
, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/50 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
2880045
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
4191
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1107907831
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_military_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Military_draft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed._2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Conscientious_objection +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Armed_forces +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases%2C_volume_380 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F._Supp. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/God +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Welsh_v._United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chuck_Fager +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/2d_Cir. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1965_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Certiorari +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Daniel_Seeger +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Conscientious_objector +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedatea
|
--11-16
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedateb
|
17
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
1964
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
United States v. Seeger,
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence
|
Douglas
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--03-08
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
1965
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Forest Britt Peter v. United States
, United States v. Arno Sascha Jakobson;
, United States v. Daniel Andrew Seeger;
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Warren, Black, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Goldberg
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/163/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
United States v. Seeger
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/loc
|
http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep380/usrep380163/usrep380163.pdf +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Clark
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/oyez
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/50 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
172800.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
17280.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
163
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
380
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:About +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_book +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:ISBN +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Wikisource-inline +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_military_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Conscientious_objection +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1965_in_United_States_case_law +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Seeger?oldid=1107907831&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Seeger +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
United States v. Arno Sascha Jakobson;
, Forest Britt Peter v. United States
, United States v. Daniel Andrew Seeger;
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/United_States_v._Seeger +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.088rby +
, http://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/%EB%AF%B8%EA%B5%AD_%EB%8C%80_%EC%8B%9C%EA%B1%B0_%EC%82%AC%EA%B1%B4 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Seeger +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/B8Gy +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q11242550 +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (196 … United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the exemption from the military draft for conscientious objectors could be reserved not only for those professing conformity with the moral directives of a supreme being but also for those whose views on war derived from a "sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those" who had routinely gotten the exemption.e" who had routinely gotten the exemption.
, 미국 대 시거 사건(United States v. Seeger, 380 U. … 미국 대 시거 사건(United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965))은 미국 연방대법원 판례로 양심적 병역거부자에 대한 유명 판결이다. 양심적 병역거부는 종교적 신념에서만 가능한 것이 아니라 "신에 대한 정통적 믿음으로 꽉 차 있는 신념에 비견되는 정도로 그 신념의 소유자의 삶에서 자리잡고 있는" "진지하고 유의미한"(sincere and meaningful) 신념에서도 가능하다고 판시하였다. 청원인인 Seeger는 병역거부로 기소되었는데 그는 신의 존재를 믿지 않으나 자신의 신념으로 집총을 거부하였다. 이는 양심적 병역거부를 심사하는 기준에 부합하지 않았고 그는 병역기피로 기소되자 그는 대법원에 상소하였다. 미국 대법원에 따르면 법원은 종교의 자유의 원칙에 따라 청원인이 절대 유일신에 대한 믿음이 없다는 이유로 종교적이지 않다고 판단하는 것은 위헌이라고 판시하였다.믿음이 없다는 이유로 종교적이지 않다고 판단하는 것은 위헌이라고 판시하였다.
|
| rdfs:label |
United States v. Seeger
, 미국 대 시거 사건
|
