http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 ( … United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the 6–3 majority, ruled that although the elements of a crime may not be considered "serious," sentence enhancements related to a defendant's prior record will bear on how the determination is made.ill bear on how the determination is made.
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1646.ZS.html +
, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/553/377/ +
, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/06-1646.pdf +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/464/1072/617025/ +
, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-1646 +
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
17554452
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
5510
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
927451869
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases%2C_volume_553 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.3d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Heroin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Washington_state +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rule_of_lenity +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed._2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/9th_Cir. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Armed_Career_Criminal_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Burglary +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Armed_Career_Criminal_Act_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F._App%27x +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2008_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pistol +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Samuel_Alito +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Certiorari +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_Washington +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Parole +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_sentencing_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Statutory_interpretation +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedate
|
--01-15
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
2008
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
United States v. Rodriquez,
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/cornell
|
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1646.ZS.html +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--05-19
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
2008
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Souter
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/docket
|
6
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
United States v. Gino Gonzaga Rodriquez
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
3.15576E8
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/joindissent
|
Stevens, Ginsburg
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/553/377/ +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
United States v. Rodriquez
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Alito
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/otherSource
|
Supreme Court
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/otherUrl
|
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/06-1646.pdf +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/oyez
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/06-1646 +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
172800.0
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
25920.0
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/subsequent
|
471
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
377
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
553
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Usc +
|
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Armed_Career_Criminal_Act_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_sentencing_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2008_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
|
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rodriquez?oldid=927451869&ns=0 +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rodriquez +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
United States v. Gino Gonzaga Rodriquez
|
owl:sameAs |
http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0465cv0 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7893456 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4whzp +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Rodriquez +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/United_States_v._Rodriquez +
|
rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
rdfs:comment |
United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 ( … United States v. Rodriquez, 553 U.S. 377 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case interpreting the Armed Career Criminal Act. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the 6–3 majority, ruled that although the elements of a crime may not be considered "serious," sentence enhancements related to a defendant's prior record will bear on how the determination is made.ill bear on how the determination is made.
|
rdfs:label |
United States v. Rodriquez
|