| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
후퇴 논증 (後退論證, 라틴어: diallelus < 그리스어: di allelon, 다른 것을 통하여)은 인식론의 문제이며, 일반적으로 어떤 주장이 정당화되어야 하는 상황에서의 문제이다. 이 논증에 따르면 어떠한 명제도 정당화를 요구하나, 어떠한 정당화도 그 스스로는 근거를 필요로 한다. 이는 어떠한 명제도 무한히 의심받을 수 있음을 의미한다.
, L'argument de la régression (aussi connu s … L'argument de la régression (aussi connu sous le nom diallelus en latin et di allelon « grâce ou par l'intermédiaire d'une autre » en grec) est un problème épistémologique et, en général, un problème en toute situation où une affirmation doit être justifiée. Selon cet argument, toute proposition requiert une justification. Cependant, toute justification elle-même exige un support. Cela signifie que quelle proposition que ce soit peut être interrogée sans fin (à l'infini).eut être interrogée sans fin (à l'infini).
, O argumento do regresso (também conhecido … O argumento do regresso (também conhecido como o dialelo (latim < grego di allelon "através ou por meio de um outro")) é um problema de epistemologia e, em geral, um problema em qualquer situação onde uma afirmativa tem que ser justificada. De acordo com este argumento, qualquer proposição requer uma justificação. No entanto, qualquer justificação em si só requer uma justificação. Isso significa que qualquer proposição pode ser infinitamente questionada.osição pode ser infinitamente questionada.
, Een regressieargument is een argument dat … Een regressieargument is een argument dat aantoont dat 1.
* een oplossing faalt omdat deze in een regressie van verdere problemen raakt; of 2.
* een stelling onwaar is omdat deze absurde regressieve gevolgen heeft. Zulke argumenten worden veelvuldig gebruikt in de filosofie.orden veelvuldig gebruikt in de filosofie.
, In epistemology, the regress argument is t … In epistemology, the regress argument is the argument that any proposition requires a justification. However, any justification itself requires support. This means that any proposition whatsoever can be endlessly (infinitely) questioned, resulting in infinite regress. It is a problem in epistemology and in any general situation where a statement has to be justified. The argument is also known as diallelus (Latin) or diallelon, from Greek di' allelon "through or by means of one another" and as the epistemic regress problem. It is an element of the Münchhausen trilemma.is an element of the Münchhausen trilemma.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Infinite_regress_en.svg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
30249
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
16700
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1091833179
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Consciousness +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Begging_the_question +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Infinitism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Plato +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Justified_true_belief +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Agrippa%27s_trilemma +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Infinite_regress_en.svg +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Pyrrhonism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Critical_philosophy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Infinite_regress +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Epoch%C3%A9 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Foundationalism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Philosophical_problems +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/G._E._Moore +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Philosophical_arguments +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Circular_argument +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Theaetetus_%28dialogue%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Proposition +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ad_infinitum +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/A_priori_and_a_posteriori +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Latin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Philosophical_skepticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Basic_belief +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pragmatism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Posterior_Analytics +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ancient_Greek +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Theory_of_justification +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sextus_Empiricus +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Justification_%28epistemology%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Aristotle +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/William_James +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Thomas_Reid +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Karl_Popper +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Agrippa_the_Skeptic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Coherentism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Epistemology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pyrrhonism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/If_and_only_if +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Concepts_in_epistemology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trope_%28philosophy%29 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Epistemology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Blockquote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Quote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Annotated_link +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Pyrrhonism_sidebar +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Skepticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Pyrrhonism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Philosophical_problems +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Concepts_in_epistemology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Justification_%28epistemology%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Philosophical_arguments +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Problem +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regress_argument?oldid=1091833179&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Infinite_regress_en.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regress_argument +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/Argument_de_la_r%C3%A9gression +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7309531 +
, http://pt.dbpedia.org/resource/Argumento_do_regresso_%28epistemologia%29 +
, http://nl.dbpedia.org/resource/Regressieargument +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Regress_argument +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4u94S +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.07fy6 +
, http://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/%ED%9B%84%ED%87%B4_%EB%85%BC%EC%A6%9D +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Regress_argument +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Attribute100024264 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/State100024720 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Concept105835747 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatPhilosophicalProblems +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Difficulty114408086 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatConceptsInEpistemology +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Idea105833840 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Content105809192 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Problem114410605 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Condition113920835 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatPhilosophicalArguments +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Cognition100023271 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Communication100033020 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Evidence106643408 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Indication106797169 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Disease +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Argument106648724 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
후퇴 논증 (後退論證, 라틴어: diallelus < 그리스어: di allelon, 다른 것을 통하여)은 인식론의 문제이며, 일반적으로 어떤 주장이 정당화되어야 하는 상황에서의 문제이다. 이 논증에 따르면 어떠한 명제도 정당화를 요구하나, 어떠한 정당화도 그 스스로는 근거를 필요로 한다. 이는 어떠한 명제도 무한히 의심받을 수 있음을 의미한다.
, L'argument de la régression (aussi connu s … L'argument de la régression (aussi connu sous le nom diallelus en latin et di allelon « grâce ou par l'intermédiaire d'une autre » en grec) est un problème épistémologique et, en général, un problème en toute situation où une affirmation doit être justifiée. Selon cet argument, toute proposition requiert une justification. Cependant, toute justification elle-même exige un support. Cela signifie que quelle proposition que ce soit peut être interrogée sans fin (à l'infini).eut être interrogée sans fin (à l'infini).
, Een regressieargument is een argument dat … Een regressieargument is een argument dat aantoont dat 1.
* een oplossing faalt omdat deze in een regressie van verdere problemen raakt; of 2.
* een stelling onwaar is omdat deze absurde regressieve gevolgen heeft. Zulke argumenten worden veelvuldig gebruikt in de filosofie.orden veelvuldig gebruikt in de filosofie.
, In epistemology, the regress argument is t … In epistemology, the regress argument is the argument that any proposition requires a justification. However, any justification itself requires support. This means that any proposition whatsoever can be endlessly (infinitely) questioned, resulting in infinite regress. It is a problem in epistemology and in any general situation where a statement has to be justified. The argument is also known as diallelus (Latin) or diallelon, from Greek di' allelon "through or by means of one another" and as the epistemic regress problem. It is an element of the Münchhausen trilemma.is an element of the Münchhausen trilemma.
, O argumento do regresso (também conhecido … O argumento do regresso (também conhecido como o dialelo (latim < grego di allelon "através ou por meio de um outro")) é um problema de epistemologia e, em geral, um problema em qualquer situação onde uma afirmativa tem que ser justificada. De acordo com este argumento, qualquer proposição requer uma justificação. No entanto, qualquer justificação em si só requer uma justificação. Isso significa que qualquer proposição pode ser infinitamente questionada.osição pode ser infinitamente questionada.
|
| rdfs:label |
Regress argument
, Argument de la régression
, Regressieargument
, 후퇴 논증
, Argumento do regresso (epistemologia)
|
