| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
R v Sinclair 2010 SCC 35 is a leading case … R v Sinclair 2010 SCC 35 is a leading case from the Supreme Court of Canada on a detainee's right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Specifically, the case addresses two issues regarding the police's implementation duty under the right to counsel: 1) does a detainee have the right to have a lawyer present during police questioning, and 2) does a detainee have the right to make multiple phone calls to their lawyer. A majority of the Court answered the first question in the negative, and answered the second question in the negative, subject to a change of circumstances. The parties to the case were the appellant, Sinclair, the respondent, the Attorney General of British Columbia, and the following interveners: the Attorney General of Ontario, the Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada, the , the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. The case was part of a trilogy of cases released by the Supreme Court, along with and .sed by the Supreme Court, along with and .
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://web.archive.org/web/20120327153000/http:/www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/cms-sgd/fac-mem-eng.aspx%3Fcas=32537 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
32415623
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
12256
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1071711239
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ian_Binnie +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Attorney_General_of_Ontario +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2010_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Singh +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Beverley_McLachlin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Retainer_agreement +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Polygraph +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Royal_Canadian_Mounted_Police +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Director_of_Public_Prosecutions +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/British_Columbia_Court_of_Appeal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Louis_LeBel +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Manslaughter +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_criminal_procedure_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Undercover +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_McCrimmon +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/British_Columbia_Civil_Liberties_Association +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Civil_Liberties_Association +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Police_lineup +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Willier +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Oickle +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vernon%2C_British_Columbia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Section_10_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Criminal_law_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Murder +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Criminal_Lawyers%27_Association_of_Ontario +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Attorney_General_of_British_Columbia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Grant +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_British_Columbia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Louise_Charron +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Morris_Fish +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/caseName
|
R v Sinclair
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
[2010] 2 S.C.R. 310
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedDate
|
"2010-10-08"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Binnie J.
, LeBel and Fish JJ.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/docket
|
32537
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullCaseName
|
Trent Terrence Sinclair v Her Majesty the Queen
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/heardDate
|
"2009-05-12"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/history
|
Judgment for the Crown in the British Columbia Court of Appeal.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joindissent
|
Abella J.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Deschampes, Rothstein, and Cromwell JJ.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
McLachlin C.J. and Charron J.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/ratio
|
A detainee does not generally have the right to have additional phone calls with counsel, unless there has been a change of circumstances.
, A detainee does not have the right to have counsel present during a police interrogation.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/ruling
|
appeal dismissed
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/scc
|
2009
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_CanLII +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Lexum-scc2 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:SCCInfoBox +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2010_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_criminal_procedure_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Sinclair?oldid=1071711239&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Sinclair +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4tmpZ +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7274304 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0gyry6_ +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Sinclair +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
R v Sinclair 2010 SCC 35 is a leading case … R v Sinclair 2010 SCC 35 is a leading case from the Supreme Court of Canada on a detainee's right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Specifically, the case addresses two issues regarding the police's implementation duty under the right to counsel: 1) does a detainee have the right to have a lawyer present during police questioning, and 2) does a detainee have the right to make multiple phone calls to their lawyer. A majority of the Court answered the first question in the negative, and answered the second question in the negative, subject to a change of circumstances.ive, subject to a change of circumstances.
|
| rdfs:label |
R v Sinclair
|
