| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
R. c. J.A. est un arrêt de principe de 2011 de la Cour suprême du Canada concernant le consentement dans les affaires d'agression sexuelle et notamment lorsque la victime devient inconsciente.
, R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decis … R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding consent in cases of sexual assaults. The court found that a person can only consent to sexual activity if they are conscious throughout that activity. If a person becomes unconscious during the sexual activity, then they legally cannot consent, whether or not they consented earlier. In addition to the two parties (J.A. and the Attorney General of Ontario), the Court heard from two interveners: the Attorney General of Canada and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).'s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://web.archive.org/web/20120226203714/http:/scc.lexum.org/en/2011/2011scc28/2011scc28.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
31908111
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
9327
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1104654838
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Ewanchuk +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Women%27s_Legal_Education_and_Action_Fund +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_criminal_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Jobidon +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Sex_crimes_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Parliament_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Attorney_General_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Epilepsy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Erotic_asphyxiation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Attorney_General_of_Ontario +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2011_in_Canadian_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Unconsciousness +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Beverley_McLachlin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Criminal_Code_%28Canada%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Police +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alcohol_intoxication +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Ottawa +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Toronto_Star +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Spouse +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Criminal_law_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Consent_%28criminal_law%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Morris_Fish +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Appeal_for_Ontario +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Toronto +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rosie_DiManno +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Assault +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sexual_assault +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Probation +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/caseName
|
R v JA
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
2011
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedDate
|
"2011-05-27"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Fish
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/docket
|
33684
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullCaseName
|
Her Majesty The Queen v JA
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/heardDate
|
"2010-11-08"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/history
|
Judgment for the defendant in the Court of Appeal for Ontario
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joindissent
|
Binnie and LeBel
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Deschamps, Abella, Charron, Rothstein, and Cromwell
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
McLachlin
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/ratio
|
A person can only legally consent to sexua … A person can only legally consent to sexual activity if they have an operating mind during the sexual activity in question. Therefore, performing sexual activity on an unconscious person is a criminal offence – whether or not the unconscious person consented in advance.e unconscious person consented in advance.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/ruling
|
Appeal allowed and conviction entered
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/scc
|
2008
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:SCCInfoBox +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_CanLII +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Canadian_criminal_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Sex_crimes_in_Canada +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2011_in_Canadian_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Decision +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_JA?oldid=1104654838&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_JA +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4u1xT +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/R_v_JA +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0gvrv67 +
, http://fr.dbpedia.org/resource/R._c._J.A. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_JA +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7274240 +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Wrongdoing100732746 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Act100030358 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Activity100407535 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Crime100766234 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatSexCrimesInCanada +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/StatutoryOffense100774796 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/SexualAssault100774107 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Transgression100745005 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
R. c. J.A. est un arrêt de principe de 2011 de la Cour suprême du Canada concernant le consentement dans les affaires d'agression sexuelle et notamment lorsque la victime devient inconsciente.
, R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decis … R v JA 2011 SCC 28 is a criminal law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding consent in cases of sexual assaults. The court found that a person can only consent to sexual activity if they are conscious throughout that activity. If a person becomes unconscious during the sexual activity, then they legally cannot consent, whether or not they consented earlier. In addition to the two parties (J.A. and the Attorney General of Ontario), the Court heard from two interveners: the Attorney General of Canada and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).'s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF).
|
| rdfs:label |
R. c. J.A.
, R v JA
|
