| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
R v Cheshire [1991] 1 WLR 844 is an Englis … R v Cheshire [1991] 1 WLR 844 is an English criminal law case establishing the role of the jury in finding liability for death, where subsequent medical negligence occurs following the original injury. The Court of Appeal found that the jury did not have to weigh up different causes of death, and need only be satisfied that the defendant's actions made a "significant contribution" to the victim's death.icant contribution" to the victim's death.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Tracheostomy_tube.jpg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
11400852
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
3585
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1082980526
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tracheostomy_tube +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Smith_%28Thomas_Joseph%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/English_criminal_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Jordan +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Appeal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Roy_Beldam +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_%28England_and_Wales%29_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jury +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1991_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Per_curiam +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1991_in_British_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:English_criminal_case_law +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
--04-24
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Appeal +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"1991-04-22"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullName
|
R v Cheshire
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
Beldam LJ, Boreham J and Auld J
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
homicide
, causation
, Breaking the chain
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
R v Cheshire
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions
|
Beldam LJ delivering the judgment of the court
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/subsequentActions
|
none
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cquote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_dmy_dates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_Court_Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_%28England_and_Wales%29_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1991_in_British_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1991_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:English_criminal_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Cheshire?oldid=1082980526&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Tracheostomy_tube.jpg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Cheshire +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4u5wu +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7278259 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Cheshire +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.02rb84_ +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
|
| rdfs:comment |
R v Cheshire [1991] 1 WLR 844 is an Englis … R v Cheshire [1991] 1 WLR 844 is an English criminal law case establishing the role of the jury in finding liability for death, where subsequent medical negligence occurs following the original injury. The Court of Appeal found that the jury did not have to weigh up different causes of death, and need only be satisfied that the defendant's actions made a "significant contribution" to the victim's death.icant contribution" to the victim's death.
|
| rdfs:label |
R v Cheshire
|
