http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc … Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a color could meet the legal requirements for trademark registration under the Lanham Act, provided that it has acquired secondary meaning in the market. acquired secondary meaning in the market.
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/514/159.html +
, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17905304466595211702&q=Qualitex%2BCo.%2Bv.%2BJacobson%2BProducts%2BCo.&hl=en&as_sdt=2006 +
, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17905304466595211702 +
, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/93-1577 +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/13/1297/631878/ +
, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/514/159/ +
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
6819750
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
6524
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1018425785
|
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Functionality_doctrine +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S.P.Q.2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stephen_Breyer +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Non-conventional_trademark +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dry_cleaning +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Colour_trade_mark +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Defendant +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lawsuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.3d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases%2C_volume_514 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trademark +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Plaintiff +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed._2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Unfair_competition +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Green +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cost +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trade_dress +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gold_%28color%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Color +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trademark_infringement +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bloomberg_BNA +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1995_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Color_trademark +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judgment_%28law%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lanham_Act +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Central_District_of_California +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_trademark_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9_des_Produits_Nestl%C3%A9_S.A._v._Cadbury_UK_Limited +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quality_%28business%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Marketplace +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Symbol +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/arguedate
|
--01-09
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/argueyear
|
1995
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc.,
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--03-28
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
1995
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/findlaw
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/514/159.html +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/googlescholar
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=17905304466595211702 +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
Under the Lanham Act, a color can be regis … Under the Lanham Act, a color can be registered as a trademark. Individual colors, however, cannot be deemed "inherently distinctive," so the registrant must demonstrate that the color has acquired "secondary meaning" in consumers' minds as indicating the source of the registrant's goods.ting the source of the registrant's goods.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
unanimous
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/514/159/ +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/lawsapplied
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lanham_Act +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc.
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Breyer
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/oyez
|
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/93-1577 +
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/parallelcitations
|
17280.0
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
25920.0
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/uspage
|
159
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/usvol
|
514
|
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:UnitedStatesCode +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Note +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:USArticleI +
|
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_trademark_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1995_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases +
|
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualitex_Co._v._Jacobson_Products_Co.?oldid=1018425785&ns=0 +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualitex_Co._v._Jacobson_Products_Co. +
|
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name
|
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc.
|
owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7268702 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Qualitex_Co._v._Jacobson_Products_Co. +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0gqn8g +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4tP6g +
, http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Qualitex_Co._v._Jacobson_Products_Co. +
|
rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/LegalCase +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Case +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/UnitOfWork +
|
rdfs:comment |
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc … Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a color could meet the legal requirements for trademark registration under the Lanham Act, provided that it has acquired secondary meaning in the market. acquired secondary meaning in the market.
|
rdfs:label |
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.
|