| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
문학평론과 문화연구 분야에서 후기비평(postcritique)이란 비판, 비 … 문학평론과 문화연구 분야에서 후기비평(postcritique)이란 비판, 비판 이론, 그리고 의 방법들을 넘어서 읽기와 해석을 위해 새로운 형태들을 찾기위한 시도이다. 이러한 방법은 폴 리쾨르에 의해 "의심의 해석학"으로 특징이 정의되고 또한 이브 세지윅에 의해서는 "편집증" 또는 의심스러운 읽기 스타일로 특징이 정의된다. 후기비평의 지지자들은 주장하기를 이런 읽기 방식들을 가지고 해석을 실천하는 것은 유용하고 흥미로운 결과들을 무시하는 것이 아니라고 한다. Rita Felski 와 Elizabeth S. Anker는 비평과 후기비평(Critique and Postcritique)이라는 책의 서문에서 "질문, 비신화, 차별화의 지적 혹은 정치적 보상들은 더 이상 자명하지 못하다고 한다." 문학적인 본문을 후기비평적으로 읽는 것은 그 대신 감정이나 애정을 강조하거나 독자안에서 다양한 현상적이며 미학적 차원을 묘사하는 것이다. 어떤 때에는 그것이 읽기 과정을 통하여 얻은 철학적 통찰력을 설명하거나 본문의 형식적인 질문을 제시하거나 혼동감을 해결하기 위해 노력하는 것이다. 본문의 형식적인 질문을 제시하거나 혼동감을 해결하기 위해 노력하는 것이다.
, In literary criticism and cultural studies … In literary criticism and cultural studies, postcritique is the attempt to find new forms of reading and interpretation that go beyond the methods of critique, critical theory, and ideological criticism. Such methods have been characterized as a "hermeneutics of suspicion" by Paul Ricœur and as a "paranoid" or suspicious style of reading by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. Proponents of postcritique argue that the interpretive practices associated with these ways of reading are now unlikely to yield useful or even interesting results. As Rita Felski and Elizabeth S. Anker put it in the introduction to Critique and Postcritique, "the intellectual or political payoff of interrogating, demystifying, and defamiliarizing is no longer quite so self-evident." A postcritical reading of a literary text might instead emphasize emotion or affect, or describe various other phenomenological or aesthetic dimensions of the reader's experience. At other times, it might focus on issues of reception, explore philosophical insights gleaned via the process of reading, pose formalist questions of the text, or seek to resolve a "sense of confusion." Importantly, postcritique is not a straightforward repudiation of critique, but instead seeks to supplement it with new interpretative practices. It views critique as being valuable in certain situations, but inadequate in others. As Felski claims in The Uses of Literature, critical and postcritical readings can and should coexist. "In the long run," she argues, "we should all heed Ricœur’s advice to combine a willingness to suspect with an eagerness to listen; there is no reason why our readings cannot blend analysis and attachment, criticism and love." Felski is careful to point out, in her later study The Limits of Critique, that her argument "is not conceived as a polemic against critique." In a similar spirit, Christopher Castiglia claims that critique can be salvaged if scholars renounce "critiquiness," which he associates with smug knowingness and thoroughgoing skepticism. Postcritical approaches to texts are often experimental, concerned with discovering new styles, postures, and stances of reading, as well as "testing out new possibilities and intellectual alternatives" to the standard operations of critique. According to Matthew Mullins, postcritique has important implications for understanding the broader role and purpose of the humanities. He claims that it offers practitioners both "positive language and methods from which to make a case for why the humanities matter at a moment when higher education faces threats from forces such a privatization and utilitarianism." such a privatization and utilitarianism."
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv=MwV-dIVNRKI +
, https://criticalinquiry.uchicago.edu/davide_panagia_reviews_the_limits_of_critique/ +
, https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/critique-neo-kantianism-and-literary-study +
, http://post45.research.yale.edu/2019/01/the-statue-and-the-veil-postcritique-in-the-age-of-trump/ +
, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/are-we-postcritical/%23%21 +
, https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/post-critical-reading-and-new-hegelianism +
, https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/suspicion-solidarity +
, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/reading-bad/ +
, https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/we-have-never-been-critical +
, http://www.makemag.com/review-the-limits-of-critique/ +
, https://jhiblog.org/2016/11/28/ideas-of-attachment-what-the-postcritical-turn-means-for-the-history-of-ideas/ +
, https://www.artsatl.org/tag/how-to-live-in-a-postcritical-world-review-of-rita-felski/ +
, http://u.arizona.edu/~selisker/post/felskicritique/ +
, https://thepointmag.com/2015/criticism/when-nothing-is-cool +
, https://arcade.stanford.edu/content/dawn-be-alive-versions-%E2%80%9Cpostcritical%E2%80%9D-1999-2015 +
, https://postcriticalir.wordpress.com/ +
, https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/people/rita-felski +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
60267444
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
37082
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1124939188
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Unconscious_mind +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/T._S._Eliot +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/C._S._Lewis +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jacques_Ranci%C3%A8re +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Western_culture +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Visual_arts +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Karl_Marx +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/George_Steiner +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stanley_Cavell +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Post-critical +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sociology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reception_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bruno_Latour +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Carlos_Castaneda +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Passive-aggressive_behavior +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Walter_Benjamin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Manuel_Puig +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Resistant_reading +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michael_Polanyi +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sharon_Marcus +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/International_relations_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Four_Quartets +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/PMLA_%28journal%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alain_Badiou +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michel_Serres +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hermeneutics_of_suspicion +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Affect_%28psychology%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Literary_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Explication_de_Texte +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Social_justice +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F._R._Leavis +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/John_Guillory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Straw_man +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Critique +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jim_Thompson_%28writer%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Politics_of_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jonathan_Luke_Austin +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ludwig_Wittgenstein +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Political_philosophy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Friedrich_Nietzsche +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/John_Bayley_%28writer%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Art_criticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paul_Ric%C5%93ur +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Simon_During +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Slow_reading +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ideological_criticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judith_Fetterley +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Formalism_%28literature%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Manny_Farber +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Literary_criticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gilles_Deleuze +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Russ_Castronovo +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Humanities +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Close_reading +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Between_the_World_and_Me +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Theodor_W._Adorno +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Merve_Emre +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Michel_Foucault +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quietism_%28philosophy%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Literary_criticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sigmund_Freud +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Philosophy +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/The_Killer_Inside_Me +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Critical_race_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Poetics_%28Aristotle%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reading_%28process%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ta-Nehisi_Coates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Steven_Connor +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Economics +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Phenomenology_%28philosophy%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Social_science +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Skepticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rita_Felski +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Eve_Kosofsky_Sedgwick +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Morality +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Toril_Moi +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Aesthetics +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/History_of_ideas +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/American_studies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Reading_%28process%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Susan_Sontag +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Louis_Althusser +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pierre_Bayard +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kiss_of_the_Spider_Woman_%28novel%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Actor%E2%80%93network_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cultural_studies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Critical_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Conspiracy_theory +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Religious_studies +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/International_relations +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Litcrit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Research_paper +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Short_description +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:For +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Library_resources_box +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Reading_%28process%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Literary_criticism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Literary_theory +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postcritique?oldid=1124939188&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postcritique +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Postcritique +
, http://ko.dbpedia.org/resource/%ED%9B%84%EA%B8%B0%EB%B9%84%ED%8F%89 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/A3P7H +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q65084098 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
문학평론과 문화연구 분야에서 후기비평(postcritique)이란 비판, 비 … 문학평론과 문화연구 분야에서 후기비평(postcritique)이란 비판, 비판 이론, 그리고 의 방법들을 넘어서 읽기와 해석을 위해 새로운 형태들을 찾기위한 시도이다. 이러한 방법은 폴 리쾨르에 의해 "의심의 해석학"으로 특징이 정의되고 또한 이브 세지윅에 의해서는 "편집증" 또는 의심스러운 읽기 스타일로 특징이 정의된다. 후기비평의 지지자들은 주장하기를 이런 읽기 방식들을 가지고 해석을 실천하는 것은 유용하고 흥미로운 결과들을 무시하는 것이 아니라고 한다. Rita Felski 와 Elizabeth S. Anker는 비평과 후기비평(Critique and Postcritique)이라는 책의 서문에서 "질문, 비신화, 차별화의 지적 혹은 정치적 보상들은 더 이상 자명하지 못하다고 한다." 문학적인 본문을 후기비평적으로 읽는 것은 그 대신 감정이나 애정을 강조하거나 독자안에서 다양한 현상적이며 미학적 차원을 묘사하는 것이다. 어떤 때에는 그것이 읽기 과정을 통하여 얻은 철학적 통찰력을 설명하거나 본문의 형식적인 질문을 제시하거나 혼동감을 해결하기 위해 노력하는 것이다. 본문의 형식적인 질문을 제시하거나 혼동감을 해결하기 위해 노력하는 것이다.
, In literary criticism and cultural studies … In literary criticism and cultural studies, postcritique is the attempt to find new forms of reading and interpretation that go beyond the methods of critique, critical theory, and ideological criticism. Such methods have been characterized as a "hermeneutics of suspicion" by Paul Ricœur and as a "paranoid" or suspicious style of reading by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. Proponents of postcritique argue that the interpretive practices associated with these ways of reading are now unlikely to yield useful or even interesting results. As Rita Felski and Elizabeth S. Anker put it in the introduction to Critique and Postcritique, "the intellectual or political payoff of interrogating, demystifying, and defamiliarizing is no longer quite so self-evident." A postcritical reading of a literary text mighttcritical reading of a literary text might
|
| rdfs:label |
Postcritique
, 후기비평
|
