| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005), was a case decided by the Federal Circuit that clarified the hierarchy of evidentiary sources usable for claim construction in patent law.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-federal-circuit/1398650.html +
, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/791122/edward-h-phillips-v-awh-corporation-hopeman-brothers-inc-and-lofton/ +
, https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/415/1303/524873/ +
, https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2207195741320793153 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
32983783
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
6656
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1063284674
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Raymond_C._Clevenger +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alan_David_Lourie +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_patent_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2005_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.3d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/William_Curtis_Bryson +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alvin_Anthony_Schall +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Haldane_Robert_Mayer +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Randall_Ray_Rader +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sharon_Prost +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_J._Gajarsa +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paul_Redmond_Michel +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Timothy_B._Dyk +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Claim_construction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S.P.Q.2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Patent_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Federal_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pauline_Newman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Richard_Linn +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
25920.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
17280.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/dissent
|
Lourie
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/courtlistener
|
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/791122/edward-h-phillips-v-awh-corporation-hopeman-brothers-inc-and-lofton/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--07-12
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
2005
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dissent
|
Mayer
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/findlaw
|
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-federal-circuit/1398650.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
Edward H. Phillips v. AWH Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/googlescholar
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=2207195741320793153 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/holding
|
The most important source in the evidentia … The most important source in the evidentiary hierarchy of claim construction is the ordinary meaning of the language of the claims themselves and other intrinsic sources like the prosecution history. Extrinsic evidence like dictionaries and expert testimony are of secondary importance.ert testimony are of secondary importance.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinconcurrence/dissent
|
Newman
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joindissent
|
Newman
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Michel, Clevenger, Rader, Schall, Gajarsa, Linn, Dyk, and Prost
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
En banc Court: Chief Judge Paul Redmond Mi … En banc Court: Chief Judge Paul Redmond Michel; Circuit Judges Pauline Newman, Haldane Robert Mayer, Alan David Lourie, Raymond C. Clevenger, Randall Ray Rader, Alvin Anthony Schall, William Curtis Bryson, Arthur J. Gajarsa, Richard Linn, Timothy B. Dyk, and Sharon Prostard Linn, Timothy B. Dyk, and Sharon Prost
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/415/1303/524873/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
Phillips v. AWH Corp.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Bryson
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:UnitedStatesCode +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_COA_case +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2005_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_patent_case_law +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_v._AWH_Corp.?oldid=1063284674&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_v._AWH_Corp. +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Phillips_v._AWH_Corp. +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7185951 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4tfpV +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0h561kq +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005), was a case decided by the Federal Circuit that clarified the hierarchy of evidentiary sources usable for claim construction in patent law.
|
| rdfs:label |
Phillips v. AWH Corp.
|
