| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
In re Ferguson, 558 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2 … In re Ferguson, 558 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009) is an early 2009 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affirming a rejection of business method claims by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). One of the first post-Bilski decisions by a Federal Circuit panel, Ferguson confirms the breadth of the en banc Bilski opinion's rejection of the core holdings in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc. Ferguson was brought as a test case by patent attorney Scott Harris in what proved to be an unsuccessful effort to compel the PTO to accept as patent-eligible subject matter a "paradigm," which is a pattern for a business organization. Harris was also one of the named inventors in the patent application. Harris also unsuccessfully sought to persuade the PTO and Federal Circuit to adopt as a test of patent-eligibility ---- "Does the claimed subject matter require that the product or process has more than a scintilla of interaction with the real world in a specific way?"on with the real world in a specific way?"
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.svg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=16217885674830617735 +
, http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/07-1232/07-1232-2011-03-27.html +
, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/209167/in-re-ferguson/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
22167345
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
10085
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1087851043
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_J._Gajarsa +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Haldane_Robert_Mayer +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Machine-or-transformation_test +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/State_Street_Bank_&_Trust_Co._v._Signature_Financial_Group%2C_Inc. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_Bilski +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_patent_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/En_banc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Business_method +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Board_of_Patent_Appeals +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pauline_Newman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S.P.Q.2d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.3d +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Test_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Claim_%28patent%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Federal_Circuit +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/case
|
25920.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
17280.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/concurrence/dissent
|
Newman
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/courtlistener
|
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/209167/in-re-ferguson/ +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/courtseal
|
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.svg
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decidedate
|
--03-06
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/decideyear
|
2009
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/fullname
|
In re Lewis Ferguson, Darryl Costin and Scott C. Harris
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/joinmajority
|
Mayer
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pauline_Newman +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Haldane_Robert_Mayer +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_J._Gajarsa +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/justia
|
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/cafc/07-1232/07-1232-2011-03-27.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/litigants
|
In re Ferguson
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/majority
|
Gajarsa
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/otherSource
|
Google Scholar
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/otherUrl
|
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=16217885674830617735 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/prior
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Board_of_Patent_Appeals +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_COA_case +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_patent_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Decision +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Ferguson?oldid=1087851043&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Seal_of_the_United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re_Ferguson +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6011675 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_Ferguson +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4nPVm +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05q5_hh +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
In re Ferguson, 558 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2 … In re Ferguson, 558 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009) is an early 2009 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, affirming a rejection of business method claims by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). One of the first post-Bilski decisions by a Federal Circuit panel, Ferguson confirms the breadth of the en banc Bilski opinion's rejection of the core holdings in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.ust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.
|
| rdfs:label |
In re Ferguson
|
