| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Guth v. Loft Inc, 5 A.2d 503, 23 Del. Ch. … Guth v. Loft Inc, 5 A.2d 503, 23 Del. Ch. 255 (Del. 1939) is a Delaware corporation law case, important for United States corporate law, on corporate opportunities and the duty of loyalty. It deviated from the year 1726 rule laid down in Keech v Sandford that a fiduciary should leave open no possibility of conflict of interest between his private dealings and the job he is entrusted to do.ealings and the job he is entrusted to do.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Pepsi_Cola_logo_1940.svg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
16862670
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
5043
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1099175165
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cola +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Delaware_General_Corporation_Law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1939_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Conflicts_of_interest +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Loft%2C_Inc. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_corporate_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Delaware_state_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Directors%27_duties +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1939_in_Delaware +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Charles_Guth +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bankruptcy_in_the_United_States +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Soda_fountains +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Duty_of_loyalty +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/The_Coca-Cola_Company +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jobber_%28merchandising%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fiduciary +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:PepsiCo +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Corporate_opportunity +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Delaware_Supreme_Court +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Delaware_corporation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Conflict_of_interest +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Daniel_J._Layton +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_corporate_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Syrup +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Keech_v_Sandford +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Harvard_Law_Review +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/PepsiCo +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
17280.0
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
Delaware Court of Chancery
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/dateDecided
|
"1939-04-11"^^xsd:date
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/judges
|
Daniel J. Layton, Richards, Rodney, Speakman, Terry
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Conflicts_of_interest +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Directors%27_duties +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Guth v. Loft Inc
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions
|
Layton
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Start_date +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Slist_director_duties +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cquote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:PepsiCo +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_corporate_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1939_in_United_States_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1939_in_Delaware +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Delaware_state_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guth_v._Loft_Inc.?oldid=1099175165&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Pepsi_Cola_logo_1940.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guth_v._Loft_Inc. +
|
| owl:sameAs |
https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4kY56 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Guth_v._Loft_Inc. +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5621727 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.011ldqk1 +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Guth v. Loft Inc, 5 A.2d 503, 23 Del. Ch. … Guth v. Loft Inc, 5 A.2d 503, 23 Del. Ch. 255 (Del. 1939) is a Delaware corporation law case, important for United States corporate law, on corporate opportunities and the duty of loyalty. It deviated from the year 1726 rule laid down in Keech v Sandford that a fiduciary should leave open no possibility of conflict of interest between his private dealings and the job he is entrusted to do.ealings and the job he is entrusted to do.
|
| rdfs:label |
Guth v. Loft Inc.
|
