| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
G 1/13 is a decision issued on 25 November … G 1/13 is a decision issued on 25 November 2014 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), holding that in opposition proceedings a retroactive effect of a restoration of a company must be recognised by the EPO. In other words, a restoration of a company has retroactive effect before the EPO when it has such retroactive effect under national law.uch retroactive effect under national law.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Scale_of_justice.png?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/2014/11/a114.html +
, https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/t090022ex1.html +
, https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/g130001ex1.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
71702596
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
5859
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1122960993
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_Europe +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wim_Van_der_Eijk +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Scale_of_justice.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Appeal_procedure_before_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Case_law_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Jurisdiction +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:More_citations_needed +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Blockquote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:EPO_Case_law_book_2022 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Decisions_and_opinions_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:ECLI +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Case_law_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Jurisdiction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_Europe +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_1/13?oldid=1122960993&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Scale_of_justice.png +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage
|
https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/2014/11/a114.html +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_1/13 +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q114088892 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/Gjw7W +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/G_1/13 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
G 1/13 is a decision issued on 25 November … G 1/13 is a decision issued on 25 November 2014 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), holding that in opposition proceedings a retroactive effect of a restoration of a company must be recognised by the EPO. In other words, a restoration of a company has retroactive effect before the EPO when it has such retroactive effect under national law.uch retroactive effect under national law.
|
| rdfs:label |
G 1/13
|
