| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
G 1/11 is a decision issued on 19 March 20 … G 1/11 is a decision issued on 19 March 2014 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), holding that a Technical Board of Appeal rather than the Legal Board of Appeal is competent for an appeal against a decision of an Examining Division refusing a request for refund of a search fee under Rule 64(2) EPC, which has not been taken together with a decision granting a European patent or refusing a European patent application. In other words, the decision deals with the delimitation of competence between the EPO's Legal Board of Appeal and its Technical Boards of Appeal.Appeal and its Technical Boards of Appeal.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Scale_of_justice.png?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
https://beck-online.beck.de/Bcid/Y-300-Z-GRURINT-B-2014-S-785-N-1 +
, https://research.wolterskluwer-online.de/document/033236cf-d88d-3123-ba52-6b5f96618daa +
, https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/2014/12/a122.html +
, https://www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/recent/j090021dx1.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
70915014
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
8706
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1117639170
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wim_Van_der_Eijk +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/European_Patent_Convention +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Case_law_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Non_liquet +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/GRUR_Int. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jurisdiction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Unity_of_invention_under_the_European_Patent_Convention +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Scale_of_justice.png +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Jurisdiction +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/EPC_2000 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_Europe +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Appeal_procedure_before_the_European_Patent_Office +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Decisions_and_opinions_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:EPC_Article +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:EPO_Case_law_book_2022 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:ECLI +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:EPC_Rule +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_journal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Quote +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Case_law_of_the_Enlarged_Board_of_Appeal_of_the_European_Patent_Office +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2014_in_Europe +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Jurisdiction +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_1/11?oldid=1117639170&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Scale_of_justice.png +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/homepage
|
https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/official-journal/2014/12/a122.html +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_1/11 +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q112578399 +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/GbF19 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/G_1/11 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
G 1/11 is a decision issued on 19 March 20 … G 1/11 is a decision issued on 19 March 2014 by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO), holding that a Technical Board of Appeal rather than the Legal Board of Appeal is competent for an appeal against a decision of an Examining Division refusing a request for refund of a search fee under Rule 64(2) EPC, which has not been taken together with a decision granting a European patent or refusing a European patent application. In other words, the decision deals with the delimitation of competence between the EPO's Legal Board of Appeal and its Technical Boards of Appeal.Appeal and its Technical Boards of Appeal.
|
| rdfs:label |
G 1/11
|
