| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 is an … Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 is an English contract law case, heard by the Court of Appeal, Chancery Division, which held that notification by a third party of an offer's withdrawal is effective just like a withdrawal by the person who made an offer. The significance of this case to many students of contract law is that a promise to keep an offer open (an option) is itself a contract which must have some consideration.ntract which must have some consideration.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/thumbnail
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_%281837-1952%29.svg?width=300 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageExternalLink
|
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2006/09/where_dickinson.html +
, http://www.commonlii.org/uk/cases/UKLawRpCh/1876/150.html +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
32481148
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
6898
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1122513478
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:English_contract_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/English_contract_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/CommonLII +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chancery_Division +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/George_Mellish +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Court_of_Appeal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Breach_of_contract +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Richard_Baggallay +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Darlington_railway_station +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_%28England_and_Wales%29_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Invitation_to_treat +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Offer_and_acceptance +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1876_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Contract +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1876_in_British_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/William_Milbourne_James_%28judge%29 +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/citations
|
2
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/court
|
Court of Appeal, Divisional Court, Chancery Division
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/keywords
|
Offer and acceptance
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/name
|
Dickinson v Dodds
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_dmy_dates +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cquote +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Use_British_English +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_court_case +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1876_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Court_of_Appeal_%28England_and_Wales%29_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1876_in_British_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:English_contract_case_law +
|
| http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickinson_v_Dodds?oldid=1122513478&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/depiction
|
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Coat_of_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_%281837-1952%29.svg +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickinson_v_Dodds +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5273758 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dickinson_v_Dodds +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4iaPN +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0h1ds34 +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/ontology/SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase +
|
| rdfs:comment |
Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 is an … Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 is an English contract law case, heard by the Court of Appeal, Chancery Division, which held that notification by a third party of an offer's withdrawal is effective just like a withdrawal by the person who made an offer. The significance of this case to many students of contract law is that a promise to keep an offer open (an option) is itself a contract which must have some consideration.ntract which must have some consideration.
|
| rdfs:label |
Dickinson v Dodds
|
