| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
The commercialization of copylefted works … The commercialization of copylefted works differs from proprietary works. The economic focus tends to be on the commercialization of other scarcities, and complimentary goods rather than the free works themselves. One way to make money with copylefted works is to sell consultancy and support to the users of the work. Generally, financial profit is expected to be much lower in a business model utilising copyleft works only than in a business using proprietary works. Another way is to use the copylefted work as a commodity tool or component to provide a service or product. Android phones, for example, include the Linux kernel, which is copylefted. Unlike business models which commercialize copylefted works only, businesses which deal with proprietary products can make money by exclusive sales, single and transferable ownership, and litigation rights over the work, although some view these methods as monopolistic and unethical, such as those in the Free Software Movement and the Free Culture Movement.re Movement and the Free Culture Movement.
, A vantagem do uso comercial de obras permi … A vantagem do uso comercial de obras permitidas para cópia difere da vantagem de comercializar os tradicionais Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual (DPI). O foco econômico tende a ser sobre a monetização de outros em escassez, os bens de cortesia por outro lado focam a liberação do conteúdo. Uma forma de ganhar dinheiro com obras permitidas para cópia é vender consultoria e suporte para usuários de uma obra permitida para cópia. Geralmente, a margem financeira deverá ser muito mais baixa em um negócio em que a obra é " permitida para cópia", que em um negócio usando obras protegidas. Outra maneira é usar o trabalho de obras permitidas para cópia como uma ferramenta de mercadoria ou componente para prestar um serviço ou produto. Os próximos telefones móveis da Motorola, por exemplo, serão os baseados em produtos Linux. Empresas com produtos protegidos podem ganhar dinheiro com a venda exclusiva, por propriedade individual e intransferível, e os direitos decorrentes do litígio sobre a obra.eitos decorrentes do litígio sobre a obra.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
8041752
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
10430
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1102465017
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Administrative_receivership +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stock_market +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/ROSA_Linux +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Economics_of_intellectual_property +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Free_software +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Small_and_Medium-sized_Enterprise +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ubuntu +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Linux_distributions +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Canonical_Ltd. +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/OpenMandriva_Lx +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Girl_Talk_%28musician%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copyleft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mageia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Android_%28operating_system%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Blender_%28software%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Case_study +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Open-source_economics +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Linux_adoption +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Free_rider_problem +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Linux_distribution +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/GNU +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Linux_kernel +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Patron +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Core_business +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Business_model +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Proprietary_software +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/UserLinux +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Commerce +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Electronic_Frontier_Foundation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Software_fork +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Business_models_for_open_source_software +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Research_and_development +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kernel_%28computer_science%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Commons-based_peer_production +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Nine_Inch_Nails +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Free_Software_Foundation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Copyright_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bruce_Perens +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Free_Culture_Movement +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Publicity +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mandriva +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Free_Software_Movement +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Liquidation +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Operating_system +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Copyleft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Red_Hat +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Information_technology +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Street_Performer_Protocol +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/date
|
June 2022
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/reason
|
What does this paragraph have to do with copylefted art?
, the article conflates commercial software with OSS, when in reality freedom and commercialization are two independent axes
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Essay-like +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Intellectual_property_activism +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Better_source_needed +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Original_research +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cleanup_bare_URLs +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Citation_needed +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Multiple_issues +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:POV +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Explain +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:More_citations_needed +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Opinion +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Copyleft +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Copyright_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Economics_of_intellectual_property +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_use_of_copyleft_works?oldid=1102465017&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_use_of_copyleft_works +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Commercial_use_of_copyleft_works +
, http://pt.dbpedia.org/resource/Uso_comercial_de_obras_permitidas_para_c%C3%B3pia +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4i381 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.026pj65 +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5152588 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
A vantagem do uso comercial de obras permi … A vantagem do uso comercial de obras permitidas para cópia difere da vantagem de comercializar os tradicionais Direitos de Propriedade Intelectual (DPI). O foco econômico tende a ser sobre a monetização de outros em escassez, os bens de cortesia por outro lado focam a liberação do conteúdo. Uma forma de ganhar dinheiro com obras permitidas para cópia é vender consultoria e suporte para usuários de uma obra permitida para cópia. Geralmente, a margem financeira deverá ser muito mais baixa em um negócio em que a obra é " permitida para cópia", que em um negócio usando obras protegidas. Outra maneira é usar o trabalho de obras permitidas para cópia como uma ferramenta de mercadoria ou componente para prestar um serviço ou produto. Os próximos telefones móveis da Motorola, por exemplo, serão os móveis da Motorola, por exemplo, serão os
, The commercialization of copylefted works … The commercialization of copylefted works differs from proprietary works. The economic focus tends to be on the commercialization of other scarcities, and complimentary goods rather than the free works themselves. One way to make money with copylefted works is to sell consultancy and support to the users of the work. Generally, financial profit is expected to be much lower in a business model utilising copyleft works only than in a business using proprietary works. Another way is to use the copylefted work as a commodity tool or component to provide a service or product. Android phones, for example, include the Linux kernel, which is copylefted. Unlike business models which commercialize copylefted works only, businesses which deal with proprietary products can make money by exclusive sale products can make money by exclusive sale
|
| rdfs:label |
Uso comercial de obras permitidas para cópia
, Commercial use of copyleft works
|
