| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract
|
The CME v. Czech Republic and Lauder v. Cz … The CME v. Czech Republic and Lauder v. Czech Republic were parallel cases decided by two different arbitral tribunals in 2001. The difference in the two cases' outcomes is a prime example of conflicting decisions in international arbitration and is the subject of many treatises, with some authors going as far as calling it "the ultimate fiasco in investment arbitration". In 1993, US national Ronald Steven Lauder invested in Czech private television broadcaster TV Nova through his German company (which was later succeeded by the Dutch company Central European Media (CME)). Some 20 suits started in front of the Czech courts and international tribunals, including UNCITRAL arbitrations CME v. Czech Republic and Lauder v. Czech Republic, after his business partner, Czech citizen Vladimír Železný, effectively deprived CME of its investment by breaking off the deal between Lauder's and Železný's companies. CME and Lauder respectively sought damages for the alleged interference of the Czech Media Council, a government entity granting broadcasting licences, into the business arrangements between Lauder's and Železný's companies, which supposedly eventually contributed to losses experienced by Lauder. Effectively dealing with the same facts, the tribunals handed down two contradictory arbitral awards: one dismissed the claim by Lauder, while the other awarded CME damages of $270 million and 10% interest. Finally, Czech Republic paid $355 million.Finally, Czech Republic paid $355 million.
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID
|
30844422
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength
|
31331
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID
|
1119424309
|
| http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arbitral_tribunal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/TV_Nova_%28Czech_Republic%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bilateral_investment_treaties +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ronald_Steven_Lauder +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Svea_Court_of_Appeal +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Judiciary_of_the_Czech_Republic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Succession_of_states +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dissolution_of_Czechoslovakia +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/International_Chamber_of_Commerce +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/USD +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2001_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/PPF_%28company%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Czech_Republic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lloyd_Cutler +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Arbitration_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Economy_of_the_Czech_Republic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/History_of_Czechoslovakia_%281918%E2%80%931938%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/History_of_Czechoslovakia_%281989%E2%80%931992%29 +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Petr_Kellner +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Academy_of_Sciences_of_the_Czech_Republic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Netherlands +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD_%C5%A0mejc +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Central_European_Media_Enterprises +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Stephen_M._Schwebel +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dissenting_opinion +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/UNCITRAL +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ian_Brownlie +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vladim%C3%ADr_%C5%BDelezn%C3%BD +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Velvet_Revolution +
|
| http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist +
|
| http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject
|
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:2001_in_case_law +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Arbitration_cases +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:Economy_of_the_Czech_Republic +
|
| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CME/Lauder_v._Czech_Republic?oldid=1119424309&ns=0 +
|
| http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CME/Lauder_v._Czech_Republic +
|
| owl:sameAs |
http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/CME/Lauder_v._Czech_Republic +
, http://dbpedia.org/resource/CME/Lauder_v._Czech_Republic +
, http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5012873 +
, http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.0gffm7b +
, https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4e2Am +
|
| rdf:type |
http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/PsychologicalFeature100023100 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Case107308889 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Happening107283608 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/WikicatArbitrationCases +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Abstraction100002137 +
, http://dbpedia.org/class/yago/Event100029378 +
|
| rdfs:comment |
The CME v. Czech Republic and Lauder v. Cz … The CME v. Czech Republic and Lauder v. Czech Republic were parallel cases decided by two different arbitral tribunals in 2001. The difference in the two cases' outcomes is a prime example of conflicting decisions in international arbitration and is the subject of many treatises, with some authors going as far as calling it "the ultimate fiasco in investment arbitration".ltimate fiasco in investment arbitration".
|
| rdfs:label |
CME/Lauder v. Czech Republic
|
