Browse Wiki & Semantic Web

Jump to: navigation, search
Http://dbpedia.org/resource/Analytic dissection
  This page has no properties.
hide properties that link here 
  No properties link to this page.
 
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Analytic_dissection
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/abstract Analytic dissection is a concept in U.S. cAnalytic dissection is a concept in U.S. copyright law analysis of computer software. Analytic dissection is a tool for determining whether a work accused of copyright infringement is substantially similar to a copyright-protected work. In analytic dissection, unprotectable elements of a work are dissected out and discarded before making any comparison of the two works. These unprotectable components include idea (as contrasted with expression), scènes à faire (conventional elements typical of a genre), material in the public domain, and functional aspects. As the Ninth Circuit explained in the 1988 Data East case, that such elements are common to two works does not create substantial similarity. Rather, infringing similarity must be based on the similarity of what remains after the unprotectable elements are dissected out. Subsequently, in Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., the Second Circuit applied this conceptual tool in determining whether two computer programs were substantially similar, under the name of the "Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison" test. As the Tenth Circuit concisely explained this test in Gates Rubber v. Bando Chemical Industries: [A] court should dissect the program according to its varying levels of generality as provided in the abstractions test. Second, poised with this framework, the court should examine each level of abstraction in order to filter out those elements of the program that are unprotectable. Filtration should eliminate from comparison the unprotectable elements of ideas, processes, facts, public domain information, merger material, scènes à faire material, and other unprotectable elements suggested by the particular facts of the program under examination. Third, the court should then compare the remaining protectable elements with the allegedly infringing program to determine whether the defendants have misappropriated substantial elements of the plaintiff's program. This legal test has generally "been applied in subsequent [copyright law] decisions, to the extent that it is recognised in the USA, and elsewhere, as the accepted standard." and elsewhere, as the accepted standard."
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageID 20397298
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageLength 3590
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageRevisionID 925155433
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink http://dbpedia.org/resource/O%27Reilly_v._Morse + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ninth_Circuit + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Public_domain + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sc%C3%A8nes_%C3%A0_faire + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison_test + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Parker_v._Flook + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Computer_software + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Neilson_v._Harford + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Second_Circuit + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mayo_v._Prometheus + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Computer_Associates_International%2C_Inc._v._Altai%2C_Inc. + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._copyright_law + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_copyright_law + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Point_of_novelty + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copyright_infringement + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jepson_claim + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Substantial_similarity +
http://dbpedia.org/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:BBstyle +
http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_copyright_law +
http://purl.org/linguistics/gold/hypernym http://dbpedia.org/resource/Concept +
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_dissection?oldid=925155433&ns=0 +
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/isPrimaryTopicOf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_dissection +
owl:sameAs https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4Q1xY + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Analytic_dissection + , http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q4751127 + , http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.04zwwhs +
rdfs:comment Analytic dissection is a concept in U.S. cAnalytic dissection is a concept in U.S. copyright law analysis of computer software. Analytic dissection is a tool for determining whether a work accused of copyright infringement is substantially similar to a copyright-protected work. Subsequently, in Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., the Second Circuit applied this conceptual tool in determining whether two computer programs were substantially similar, under the name of the "Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison" test. As the Tenth Circuit concisely explained this test in Gates Rubber v. Bando Chemical Industries:Gates Rubber v. Bando Chemical Industries:
rdfs:label Analytic dissection
hide properties that link here 
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Brown_Bag_Software_v._Symantec_Corp. + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Patentable_subject_matter + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Computer_Associates_International%2C_Inc._v._Altai%2C_Inc. + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Diamond_v._Diehr + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Novelty_%28patent%29 + , http://dbpedia.org/resource/Data_East_USA%2C_Inc._v._Epyx%2C_Inc. + http://dbpedia.org/ontology/wikiPageWikiLink
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_dissection + http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start semantic browsing from.